Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Timea Bacsinszky vs Marina Erakovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bacsinszky vs Erakovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Timea Bacsinszky vs Marina Erakovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bacsinszky 3 - 0 Erakovic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bacsinszky has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Erakovic has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bacsinszky, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Erakovic has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bacsinszky has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Erakovic has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bacsinszky has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Erakovic winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bacsinszky has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 198/ 90), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 111/ 87). Erakovic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 72% (W/L 78/ 30), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 63/ 58).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Bacsinszky winning 3 times and Erakovic being victorious 0 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Bacsinszky winning 6 and Erakovic winning 2. The last match between Bacsinszky and Erakovic was at the Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat, 30-04-2016, Final, Clay with Timea Bacsinszky getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:25.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bacsinszky and Erakovic have played a deciding set 2 times, with Bacsinszky winning 2 times and Erakovic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bacsinszky winning 0, and Erakovic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bacsinszky has played against opponents with an average rank of while Erakovic has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bacsinszky has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Erakovic has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bacsinszky has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Erakovic has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
9
High
34
Age
R
Plays
3
Total0
2
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
39
High
36
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
62% (409-247)
Career Total W/L
59% (351-248)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,467,520
Career Prize Money
$1,064,430
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bacsinszky VS Erakovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Timea Bacsinszky | Marina Erakovic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 2 |
| Games Won | 44 | 29 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:8:25 | 1:8:25 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (137/213) | 63% (160/253) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (95/137) | 62% (99/160) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (42/76) | 39% (36/93) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (14/31) | 54% (7/13) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (118/253) | 36% (76/213) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (1/0) |
Bacsinszky VS Erakovic H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Timea Bacsinszky
Player
Marina Erakovic
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Timea Bacsinszky
Player
Marina Erakovic
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
26 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
100
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
| 3-6 7-5 6-4 |
Stats
Timea Bacsinszky
Player
Marina Erakovic
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
9
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
45%
(
44 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Timea Bacsinszky | Marina Erakovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Timea Bacsinszky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kristie Ahn
Player
Timea Bacsinszky
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caty McNally
Player
Timea Bacsinszky
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Timea Bacsinszky
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
69 of
106)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
54 of
106)
112
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kurumi Nara
Player
Timea Bacsinszky
71%
(
80 of
113)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
99)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
67%
(
10 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
57 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
56 of
99)
112
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Timea Bacsinszky
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktorija Golubic
Player
Timea Bacsinszky
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Timea Bacsinszky
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
52%
(
38 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timea Bacsinszky
Player
Nao Hibino
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timea Bacsinszky
Player
Anna Tatishvili
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Kurumi Nara
Player
Timea Bacsinszky
83%
(
74 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Marina Erakovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefanie Voegele
Player
Marina Erakovic
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Marina Erakovic
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marina Erakovic
Player
Anna Schmiedlova
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marina Erakovic
Player
Grace Min
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sanaz Marand
Player
Marina Erakovic
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
46%
(
37 of
81)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
13
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marina Erakovic
Player
Laura Robson
52%
(
47 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
6
Aces
9
13
Double Faults
10
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Marina Erakovic
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
10
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marina Erakovic
Player
Alla Kudryavtseva
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fanny Stollar
Player
Marina Erakovic
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Bacsinszky Vs Erakovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
